Total Pageviews

Tuesday, October 14, 2014

EEOC and Employment Discrimination Overview

EEO Complaint – tactics for filing.

We have recently had an influx of EEO (Equal Employment Opportunity) complaints at the Firm, so I thought a few minutes spent discussing EEO tactics would be helpful for future would-be filers.

First, the process for filing a complaint requires a thorough analysis of the claim itself. There are two very distinctly different types of employment claims.

  1. A suit filed against an employer for violation of employment discrimination law. These include must Title VII (race, color, creed, national origin, gender), American with Disability Act (illness or disability), Pregnancy Discrimination, sexual orientation, family leave, and Age Discrimination in Employment Act to name a few. To prove this, you must show that the employer did not have a reasonable, non-discriminatory business basis for the adverse employment decision. Retaliation has become a popular vehicle for discrimination suits, but requires some form of underlying protected action before it can apply. Sexual harassment or gender discrimination falls under this category. This grouping of laws carve out a “protected class” or grouping that cannot be the basis of employment decisions without seriously compelling business necessity.
  2. A suit filed for wrongful termination in violation of the employment agreement between the parties. This mostly applies to contractors, however, depending on the employment agreement between employee/employer, it may also apply to a regular employee. In this instance, a term of employment was violated by the employer, making the employer’s conduct invalid on the basis of breach of contract or estoppels.

When employment discrimination is alleged, it is important that the employee start taking notes documenting employer misconduct. Overt discrimination is rare, but does happen on occasion. In legal parlance, overt discrimination is called “disparate treatment”. This occurs when the employer states they are taking some action against you on account of your protected class. For example, your boss indicates you cannot be promoted because you are male. This is a form of overt, intentional discrimination that leads directly to a legal argument in front of a judge.

Usually, however, discrimination takes the course of “disparate impact.” In this form of discrimination, the employer does nothing overt. Instead, he engages in a pattern and practice of discriminatory practice designed to “push” the undesirable protected individual out, or prevent promotions, raises, hiring, etc. of a particularly protected group. An example of this might be a consistent failure to approve any medical sick days when your boss knows you have an illness that requires treatment. The mere denial of leave is well within the purview of the employer. A pattern of denying sick leave when you need to take care of on-going medical issues could give rise to a violation of the FMLA (Family Medical Leave Act) – and show a passive method your employer is using to force you out on account of illness.

It is important to remember that the key to proving disparate impact is note keeping. You must have a good series of records and instances where the employer has acted out against you or against those similarly situated. That having been said, do not presume every negative action of your employer is aimed as discrimination against you. Discrimination is a long and difficult course to prove.

A discrimination case may be initiated with the State EEO office, or the Federal EEO office. The initial investigation often requires mediation and discovery; in the Federal government, each Federal Agency has an EEO investigation office that conducts investigations of all EEO claims. While mediation can be helpful to learn more of the opposition’s position, it should be avoided as a time wasting exercise whenever possible. The real negotiations begin when either arbitration or a hearing before the EEO administrative judge is had. It is often not advisable to agree to binding arbitration. However, arbitration itself can be very employee friendly given the often significantly relaxed evidentiary standards (although this is not always the case, and research should be done to determine with whom the arbitration will be conducted and under what rules prior to agreeing to binding arbitration).

For more guidelines on how the EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) handles federal worker employment discrimination cases, visit the trial manual (rules of court) at: MD110 Guidelines.
For more information about how to file a basic (non-federal employee) complaint with the EEOC: How to file with the EEOC.
Remember -- you have only 180 days to file (in most instances; this can be extended in certain circumstances).

Are you facing an EEO challenge? As either employer or employee, trial and employment matters can be frightening. Let us help you! Give us a call for a free, confidential, case assessment.

If you have a bankruptcy adversarial case, contact us! We can help develop both a defense and offensive strategy as required.



Hanover Law, PC
Offices in Fairfax, VA and Washington, DC
www.hanoverlawpc.com Lili O'connell, Esq.
Abby Archer, Esq.
888 16th St., NW Ste 800
Washington, DC 20006
2751 Prosperity Ave, Ste 580
Fairfax, VA 22031
Sean R. Hanover, Esq.
Stephen Salwierak, Esq.
1-800-579-9864 admin@hanoverlawpc.com Charles Hatley, Esq.
Leigh Wells, Esq.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Share your thoughts with us!