Driving under the influence of drugs - immigration consequences

Source: http://www.nwaonline.com/news/2012/jun/24/driving-drugged/

What happens if you are convicted of a DUI (driving under the influence) based on drugs. An interesting discussion. If you have digested a drug, are you in possession of that drug for immigration purposes?

Steve presented the following scenario on Friday:
A client of ours, pled to that DUI (Xanax) in Arlington. He’s been LPR for 12 years, and the only things on his record are a Reckless Driving and the DUI, both from 2016. He wants to know about naturalization. My thought on this is that his only potential question has to do with Good Moral Character, and he should probably get some help explaining that he is a person of good moral character when he submits his N-400.

Here are Steve's discussion points:

a. First of all, don’t travel outside of the US right now. He can totally get picked up on the way back in.
b. Get everything associated with the DUI (ASAP, Restricted OL, etc.) taken care of and get clear of “court supervision,” which will be done in about 12 months.
c. Once he is fully clear of the DUI matter, get his ass into our office so we can help him get to work on his N-400. I wonder if you think he should even wait a little bit longer to apply to naturalize than I am suggesting.
d. Do you know if a LPR with convictions could wind up in Removal Proceedings by getting the attention of USCIS with the submission of a N-400?

My answer:
So the bottom line is this: a drug conviction is a permanent bar to naturalization, and a cause célèbre for deportation – even for an LPR. The code that deals with this is INA § 237(a)(2)(B)(i) (deportability). Admissibility is covered under State Manual on approving entry visas (see also: INA 212 drug convictions dealing with admissability).

Xanax is a schedule IV controlled substance as defined by 21 U.S.C. 802. Apparently, it is has low probability for abuse. Also, an argument can be made that a DUI is not a drug offense per se, and if there is no inquiry into what type of DUI it was, it may be possible to submit a disposition paper without mentioning xanax at all (the N400 adjudicator does not generally inquire into the substance of the offense if a disposition is provided). To constitute a drug offense, the statute is clear - you must be convicted of possession or distribution. There is nothing saying that ingestion constitutes possession under Federal Law.

As for good moral conduct, Ragoonanan v. USCIS, a 2007 US district court case out of Minnesota, held that one DUI conviction that results in a year of probation does not bar a good moral character finding. I’m not sure if the 4th Circuit has followed suit, but probably. You should expect a denial, followed by an appeal. It is important to show rehabilitation and regular ameliorating actions.

Do you have a question about DUI's, drug possession, or naturalization? Ask us! You may reach us at 1-800-579-9864 or admin@hanoverlawpc.com.

Hanover Law, PC
Offices in Fairfax, VA and Washington, DC
www.hanoverlawpc.com
2751 Prosperity Ave, Ste 150 Fairfax, VA 22031	Sean R. Hanover, Esq. Stephen Salwierak, Esq.
1-800-579-9864 admin@hanoverlawpc.com

Petty drug exception - admissions vs. deportability. NOT THE SAME.

Here's the scenario:

Steve was working with a client in VA state court. He asked for advice on the immigiration consequence. He said: There was a client of mine who was charged with Possession with Intent to Distribute (Marijuana) in Fairfax. We got the charge amended to straight Possession and plead guilty. He did a couple of weekends in exchange for the amended charge. He recently traveled out of the country (against our advice) and upon his return, was given a date to meet CBP out at Dulles. Bad news. I’ve already told him that he is almost certainly going to get a NTA, and possibly detained. I have a possible solution for him: The cop really liked the client, and was a huge help in getting the charge amended. There was also not very much pot at the time of the arrest. If I can get a statement from the cop that would get this within the de minimis range, we might even be able to head this off at the CBP level. Even if that didn’t work, we would have that for his defense in the eventual Removal Proceedings.

My thought is to go with him out to Dulles in November. Because he already paid us to defend him in the criminal case, and because he is very likely going to have to pay us to represent him in Removal Proceedings, I was thinking XX for the CBP meeting only. (Removal Proceedings is a whole new ball of wax.) I can try to get some help from the cop to see if we can kill this and keep our guy in the country and out of Farmville.

This is a great case to discuss the difference between INA 237 (deporability when in the US) and INA 212 (inadmissibility) concerning the petty exception.

Because the client is a returning alien, his entrance into the United States is controlled by INA 212 (restrictions on admissibility) as opposed to INA 237 (deportability once in the US). The petty exception is quite different. In 237, the exception covers marijuana at 30 grams or less. In 212, no drugs are permitted – the petty exception covers only CIMT’s whose max sentence is 1 year or less, and whose actual sentence (served or given) is 6 months or less. Because possession is not a CIMT, the petty exception under INA 212(a)(2)(A) won’t work. Because our fella is an LPR, there is a different type of waiver available for drug convictions. It actually applies to any drug conviction, not just 30 grams or less of marijuana.

The exception is found under INA 212(h). There are requirements for this, though, and I’m not sure he’ll meet them. In this case, he would have to have been an LPR for at least 15 years, or he would need to have an immediate family member who would suffer an extreme hardship. For petty drug offenses, these waivers are granted fairly routinely. However, he will have to sit in immigration court, and he will have to go to a trial. Extreme hardship will require the case to be prepared and litigated, and as you know, DHS will argue against it as a matter of course.

A frank discussion with the client will explain all this to him, and prepare him for the process. You won’t be able to head this off at the CBP level. They lack the statutory authority to approve (well, that’s technically not correct – acting on behalf of the Attorney General, a CBP officer could waive him in. Not likely, though). He need us to spearhead a 212(h) on his behalf.

Do you have a question about admissibility or CBP? We can help! Contact us at 1-800-579-9864 or admin@hanoverlawpc.com.

Hanover Law, PC
Offices in Fairfax, VA and Washington, DC
www.hanoverlawpc.com
2751 Prosperity Ave, Ste 150 Fairfax, VA 22031	Sean R. Hanover, Esq. Stephen Salwierak, Esq.
1-800-579-9864 admin@hanoverlawpc.com

Determining Arriving Alien Status

How to determine if your client is an arriving alien -- or not!

First test: Was she stopped at the border?

Yes: Continue
No: Was she stopped with ~25 miles of the border within 10 days of when she arrived?

Yes: Continue
No: Arguably not arriving alien.

Second test: Is she a US citizen?

Yes: Interesting. If they are moving to revoke citizenship (i.e. not by birth), then you have a pickle. Arguably, not an arriving alien, as only a judge could revoke citizenship and a citizen cannot be an arriving alien. So most likely – not an arriving alien.
No: Continue

Third test: Was she granted conditional parole?

Yes: This is very narrow exception. Humanitarian or CBP approved “signed at the border” parole only. In this instance, she would not have been given a return date, and she would not have been placed in removal proceedings. A deferred inspection is not a parole for this purpose.
No: Continue

Fourth test: LPR?

Yes: Is there a petty exception that the CBP officer will accept? If so, get this kicked at the deferred inspection. If not, she is an arriving alien.
No: Arriving alien

If she is an arriving alien, hope her case get’s randomly transferred to York, PA. In York, the judges oftem grant bond even for arriving aliens (must have a legal place to go in the US, and someone willing to vouch for the alien). Otherwise, you are looking at no-bond initially.

How do I get bond for an arriving alien?

1. York
2. If there has been a credible fear determination (either through Court or through CBP), then you can ask ICE to grant a bond. ICE always has the right to grant bond. Talk to the DO (Deportation Officer – fella who is responsible for your client’s case on the ICE side) and request a bond. This usually only works on successful credible fear. If you have a pending asylum application and work permit, you should be able to get this unless your DO is being particularly ornery.

Hanover Law, PC
Offices in Fairfax, VA and Washington, DC
www.hanoverlawpc.com
2751 Prosperity Ave, Ste 150 Fairfax, VA 22031	Sean R. Hanover, Esq. Stephen Salwierak, Esq.	Lili O'connell, Esq. Charles Hatley, Esq.
1-800-579-9864	admin@hanoverlawpc.com

What happens at a credible fear hearing before an immigration judge?

Credible fear hearings refer to the process of an immigration officer or judge reviewing the statements of an individual who is seeking asylum in the United States. Generally, these hearings are first conducted at the port of entry by a custom and border protection (CBP) agent, or an immigration and custom enforcement officer (ICE). Based on the determination of the CBP/ICE officer, an initial credible fear determination is made. If a credible fear of return to the asylum seekers who country is established with the officers, generally the individual is permitted to enter the United States and remain at large until their hearing is conducted before a judge on the merits of the asylum application.

However, if the CBP/ICE officer determines that there is no credible fear of returning to the asylum seekers who country, the asylum seeker is detained. At this point he/she may request a judge to review the CBP/ICS determination. This review process is called a "credible fear hearing" and is conducting before an immigration judge. A couple of pointers to remember:

• A credible fear hearing must be requested, it is not automatic.
• Your client will be detained for the entire pendency of the credible fear hearing process, and likely thereafter.
• Only ICE has jurisdiction to release your client during or after a credible fear hearing, not the immigration court or judge.

The law on the matter is contained in 8 CFR:

Credible fear standard: A Credible fear of persecution means that there is a significant possibility that the alien can establish eligibility for asylum under INA § 208 or withholding of removal (restriction on removal) under INA § 241(b)(3). The credibility of the alien statements in support of the claim, and other facts known to the reviewing official, are taken into account. 8 C.F.R. §§ 208.30(e)(2), 1003.42(d).

Credible fear of torture: means there is a significant possibility that the alien is eligible for withholding of removal (restriction on removal) or deferral of removal under the Convention Against Torture pursuant to 8 C.F.R. §§ 208.16 or 208.17. 8 C.F.R. §§ 208.30(e)(3), 1003.42(d).

[taken from the "EOIR Immigration Judges Handbook"]

How does a credible fear hearing work?

First, you don’t submit evidence at a credible fear hearing – in fact, the judge may not even speak to you as the attorney on the case. You are an observer of the process only – this is a conversation between the judge and your client. On a practical note, usually the judge will speak to you and ask you what is going on. It’s faster and easier that way. But don’t be alarmed if the judge completely ignores you. Take good notes!

Representation: Prior to the credible fear review, the alien may consult with a person or persons of the alien's choosing. In the discretion of the Immigration Judge, persons consulted may be present during the credible fear review. However, the alien is not represented at the credible fear review. Accordingly, persons acting on the alien's behalf are not entitled to make opening statements, call and question witnesses, conduct cross examinations, object to evidence, or make closing arguments.

[taken from the "EOIR Immigration Judges Handbook"; See generally INA 235(b)(1)(B), 8 CFR 1003.42]

You need to prepare your client thoroughly. The client will be able to speak to the judge and will be able to testify. The discussion will be about the credible fear interview itself. The judge will ask things like: why are there inconsistent answers, etc. He/She will be using all the CBP/ICE forms, so be sure that you have a copy of the credible fear interview and each step of what your client did and said. Your client should have been given a copy of that. If there are translation issues (as there often are; most translation for the initial credible fear at the port of entry is done over the phone), be sure to brief your client on bringing that up to the judge.

Conduct of hearing: A credible fear review is not as exhaustive or in-depth as an asylum hearing in removal proceedings. Rather, a credible fear review is simply a review of the DHS asylum officer's decision. Either the alien or DHS may introduce oral or written statements, and the court provides an interpreter if necessary. Evidence may be introduced at the discretion of the Immigration Judge. The hearing is recorded. Parties should be mindful that all requests for continuances are subject to the statutory time limits.

[taken from the "EOIR Immigration Judges Handbook"]

If the judge finds credible fear, that he/she will set a next status date (called a master calendar hearing) at which point you will turn in the I-589 and supporting initial docs. Thereafter, it proceeds according to a regular defensive asylum process.

Technically, the judge cannot release your client, as she is deemed an arriving alien, not subject to parole from the court. There are two general rules here… in some jurisdictions, such as York, and sometimes Arlington, the judge will give bond anyway, and DHS rarely objects. That is technically a violation of the code. If the judge does not (and do not be alarmed if that happens…he/she should NOT do so), you can file to have ICE give a bond. In many jurisdictions, ICE will release your client once a credible fear determination I positive. Bond usually runs about $5K. Be sure to submit a bond package, showing where your client will live and with whom, when asking ICE for a bond. It is entirely up to the DO (deportation officer) in charge of your client.

No jurisdiction by regulation: By regulation, an Immigration Judge does not have jurisdiction to conduct bond hearings involving:

• aliens in exclusion proceedings
• arriving aliens in removal proceedings
• aliens ineligible for release on security or related grounds
• aliens ineligible for release on certain criminal grounds

An asylum seeker who requests asylum at a port of entry is an arriving alien.

See: 8 CFR 1003.19(h)(2)(i)

Is there an appeal if the credible fear is denied by the judge?

No right to appeal, however, generally, you can bring a request for DHS to give one final review before deporting your client. See 8 CFR 1208.30(g)(2)(iv)(A).

Do you have a question regarding immigration law or detention hearings? Give us a call! We can help --- 1-800-579-9864 or admin@hanoverlawpc.com.

Hanover Law, PC
Offices in Fairfax, VA and Washington, DC
www.hanoverlawpc.com		Lili O'connell, Esq.
888 16th St., NW Ste 800 Washington, DC 20006	2751 Prosperity Ave, Ste 150 Fairfax, VA 22031	Sean R. Hanover, Esq. Stephen Salwierak, Esq.
1-800-579-9864	admin@hanoverlawpc.com	Charles Hatley, Esq.

Stopped by CBP - Deferred Inspection

Deferred Inspection with CBP

In this instance, there are a couple of considerations. You should expect to be placed in removal proceedings. It does not sound like you will be charged with an aggravated felony. First, this does not appear to be a crime of violence, and secondly, as you described it, it sounds like you received straight probation. As such, under sec. 1101(a)(48)(b), this probably wouldn't be an aggravated felony anyway (called "agg-fel" in our parlance).

Now, if this is NOT an aggravated felony, you might qualify for various types of relief when put into removal proceedings.

CBP and LPR -- what happens at a "deferred inspection"

Interesting case recently. A client called us with a not-to-uncommon problem. On the way back from visiting an ailing relative in Costa Rica, the family was stopped at Dulles International Airport (a la Virginia). The dreaded hand gesture was made by an immigration border officer to "go to line B". Deferred inspection is in your future.

When Custom and Border Patrol (CBP) takes your passport and gives you a date to return to talk to them -- that is deferred inspection.

So what happens? You get a deferred inspection when you have criminal incidents in your past that could reasonably lead to inadmissibility into the United States. Eh, you say? What is THAT!?

So first, a discussion on crime and immigration. Remember, no matter how old your criminal convictions they are still eligible for immigration review. There is no "ignore after certain date" -- although, there are crimes that are treated differently if your convictions fall before 1990 (among others). That notwithstanding, remember that CBP can review ANY crime convicted at ANY time. However, the crime MUST have resulted in a conviction.

When speaking of crimes, it is important to remember that any crime that has a detention or deferred sentence (suspended sentence) of 12 months or more is considered an aggravated felony, and constitutes inadmissibility on its face. That's bad.

Certain crimes can be waived under the petty exception for CIMT's. Remember that time when you were busted for shoplifting and served 30 days in the brig? Likely, a single offense can be ignored and you will not be found inadmissible.

When you go for your interview, bring a lawyer, and if you can afford one, bring a book. Whoops -- that was backwards, but I'm biased. You will be waiting for quite some time. While you are obligated to be on time for your 11AM deferred inspection, CBP will often stall and you won't be seen until 2pm! Or later. Can you sense my frustration? Baah.

Why do you need a lawyer? Well, a lawyer cannot change the law. If you have an aggravated felony, or you have been smuggling little children into the country, there is nothing the attorney nor the CBP officer can do -- our hands are tied, and the law says you will be found inadmissible. However, an attorney can make a good argument to NOT HAVE YOU DETAINED. CBP will contact ICE once they determine you are inadmissible. It is up to ICE -- not CBP -- whether you shall be detained (sent to jail while you wait for your immigration trial). NOTE -- that an aggravated felony cannot be bonded out. So, having your attorney get CBP to argue that you should NOT be detained (when speaking to ICE) is worth its weight in gold. CBP can make a good argument to have ICE just ignore you. You do NOT want to be detained. While this does not always work, it can ONLY work when you have an attorney.

When you leave (non-detained), you will have a court date from your Notice to Appear (NTA)and you should meet with your attorney to plan your case (see my posting on what to expect at your first immigration court hearing). If you are detained, you will be taken to an immigration detention center and "booked" directly from the deferred inspection meeting. You will then be given your NTA while detained, and need to get in touch with your attorney, who will need to come and meet you at the detention center. Do you need help with a CBP or deferred inspection? You came to the right place! We have considerable experience helping walk clients through tough situations. We'll walk through each step and help you get the best possible results.

http://www.hanoverlawpc.com
703-402-2723

Sean R. Hanover, Esq.
Principal Attorney
The Hanover Law Firm is located in Washington, DC and Fairfax, VA. We practice
in both state and federal courts in VA, MD, and DC.

So you're going to immigration court...what should your lawyer do?

Ah...the fun of the court room! Gotta love it!

Think "cattle call" -- do you do state or federal cases? The initial hearing equates roughly to a preliminary hearing in state/federal. The burden of moving forward is with the state, and if the respondent does not admit to the charges of removability, it is the burden of the state to prove them up. Once the state has convinced the judge that the charges are legit, the judge asks what relief the respondent seeks. Note that care must be used is admitting to the state's allegations as to removability...usually it's pretty "cold turkey" gotchas, but occasionally, they'll try to pull a quickie. Keep an eye on the regs, and the charges -- especially when a charge (state or federal criminal charge) can be viewed in different ways depending on the eye of the beholder. You can all sorts of fun stomping your feet and demanding a hearing as to the applicability or legitimacy of a particular allegation. On the same note -- don't be a jerk. If the allegation is valid, don't get a reputation of wasting court time on goofy meaningless foot dragging. This is especially true if your fella (or lass, as the case may be) is detained.

As to relief, that's where you pull out your trusty tool box and ponder the possible options. Generally, you want to do this prior to the hearing -- however, if you had not chance to see the NTA afore the hearing, take a moment to consider. Besides, you look good staring out the window rubbing your chin as you ponder how to save your client. You go, attorney! Typical relief options are Cancellation of Removal (COR 42A or 42B), some assortment of asylums (A-W-C), family adjustment (when appropriate), stalling with a plea for Prosecutorial Discretion (truly a waste), continuance for post-conviction relief (right....usually a stall tactic for some out of court magic date when bubba suddenly becomes eligible for relief), voluntary departure (one of the least understood and quite helpful tools for folks that can later adjust and don't already have EWI's etc.), and the old favorite -- a request for peonage (rarely granted, but often illicits a grin for those that know you have just asked to violate a host of immigration laws and the US constitution...but hey, if you have nothing else...)

When you really have hit the "duh...why am I here?" problem, and this is the first MCH...punt! Ask for a continuance to consider your options. Usually, you get one pass. Use it wisely.

Also, prior to requesting relief, but after a reading of the allegations (and any challenges thereunto), you'll have a chance to plead for bond, if your alleged evil alien monster is not already detained. Now, save yourself some grief, and the expectation crushing blow to your client's dying mother who just happened to attend your first MCH -- if your client has an aggravated felony (affectionately known as AgFel's). Don't know what constitutes an AgFel? Ping the law firm, and I'll send you a nifty cheat sheet (although as I have posted this prior -- I warn you that some of my more learned colleagues challenge some of the agfel definitions included on my sheet of cheating...but I'll leave that for your free time to hunt my alleged errors :). Regardless, with an AgFel, guess what? Your guest alien will not be getting out of the pokie. Don't even ask. Your client has "detained" stamped on his forehead. If you want to see if you can avoid that...TALK TO ICE BEFORE BEFORE BEFORE BEFORE (ahem...did I mention, um, "before"?) the judge has your case. The judge is compelled to keep your client detained if she has an AgFel. However, ICE can do whatever they want before EOIR takes the case. This is really important for CBP (custom and border patrol) ops (that would be LPR's that are snagged at the border for having a nefarious AgFel past that, for some reason, was allowed to be ignored for years and only now makes the evil heathens). If someone contacts you about a CBP "deferred inspection" grab them vigorously, and make SURE he or she takes you to the interview. You can beg and plead with the CBP officer to ask ICE to let your client walk -- even with AgFels. Once your client is non-detained -- judge can't revoke that, so it is possible to have a doomed, er..client out even with an AgFel. So...see if you can cajole ICE to play nice. Good luck with that, by the way :)

Let's see.. oh, and what about other MCH's? Well...they are just status hearings (a federal term for a continued case on the criminal docket). Usually you'll have one more after you plead relief so that you might have a glorious opportunity to, before all the assembled sad faced immigrants who, in court do find themselves, present a completed application of whatever relief thou hast otherwise requested in this, you first MCH.

The real fun is trying to prepare your client for their actual hearing on the merits (called an "individual calendar hearing" in immigration court parlance -- and by the way, if you are a client reading this LEARN AND DO NOT DO THESE THINGS). It is quite common to get hearing dates that are quite literally years out from the MCH (for non-detained). Your honest hard working client(s) will wander away...move to different states...go back to their home country, get DUI's (unbelievably...this is the number one charge for most of the folks that come to our office...an endemic problem in the Hispanic community of Northern VA...is there an ADA claim there somewhere? I'm game if anyone wants to help)...or, their story will change, the facts will be all wrong, and when trial comes, they'll not have provided anything you need. Remember! You are now a stunning paragon of justice and imminent speaker on all matters immigration -- so no worries (laughing)...you will persevere. On at least one in ten. (laughing again).

Court is a lot of fun, and the challenges of immigration court are really the same for all court cases -- facts and foundation. Get'um right and the relief you seek is indeed a pearl of great worth within your grasp.

http://www.hanoverlawpc.com
703-402-2723

Sean R. Hanover, Esq.
Principal Attorney
The Hanover Law Firm is located in Washington, DC and Fairfax, VA. We practice
in both state and federal courts in VA, MD, and DC.

CBP Code Stamps (Codes found in passports -- immigration law)

From time to time, we get requests to dechiper scrawl found on I-94 forms, passports, or even handwritten notes on visa pages. I am including in this brief post the codes that are often associated with those scribbles, and what they mean:

(As a footnote, credit is due to Mr. Robert Rone, an attorney in Mobile, Alabama, and Ms. Meighan L. Vargas, another attorney specializing in immigration law. While they did not come up with the codes (obviously!), they did format them in these nice tables I am displaying here.)

CBP is an abbreviation for "customs and border patrol", and it refers to the officers that inspect incoming aliens upon arrival in the US. From the CBP website:

After the successful completion of processing the applicant, a CBP officer stamps the applicant’s CBP Form I-94, Arrival and Departure Records, and the passport. The CBP Declaration, used at air and sea ports of entry, may also be stamped by the CBP officer. The CBP officer retains the arrival portion of the CBP Form I-94 and returns the departure portion of the CBP Form I-94 and passport to the applicant.

However, the following notations can be found anywhere in the a passport or visa form. They are not limited to an I-94 specifically.

Immigration Status	CARES Code	I-94 Codes	I-551 Codes	Other
Cuban/Haitian Entrant	11	212(d)(5) or paroled or C/H Entrant and from Cuba or Haiti or I-551 stamp and CU6 or CH6	CU6 or CU7, CH6	Unexpired and expired 1-551 stamp in foreign passport
Deportation Withheld	15	106 or 243(h) or 241(b)(3)	NA	INS Form I-688B annotated 274a.12(a)(10); INS Form I-766, annotated A10; order from an immigration judge showing deportation withheld under 243(h) or removal withheld under 241(b)(3)
Battered Alien	16	AR1, AR6, C20 through C29, CF1, CF2, CR1, CR6, CR7, CX1, CX2, CX3, CX6, CX7, CX8, F20 through F29, FX1, FX2, FX3, FX6, FX7, FX8, IF1, IF2, IR1, IR2, IR3, IR4, IR6, IR7, IR8, IR9, IW1, IW2, IW6, IW7, MR6, MR7, P21, P22, P23, P26, P27, P28; IB3, IB6, IB7, IB8, B11, B12, B16, B17, B20 through B29, B31, B32, B33, B36, B37, B37, B38, BX1, BX2, BX3, BX6, BX7, BX8 some Z13	AR1, AR6, C20 through C29, CF1, CF2, CR1, CR6, CR7, CX1, CX2, CX3, CX6, CX7, CX8, F20 through F29, FX1, FX2, FX3, FX6, FX7, FX8, IF1, IF2, IR1, IR2, IR3, IR4, IR6, IR7, IR8, IR9, IW1, IW2, IW6, IW7, MR6, MR7, P21, P22, P23, P26, P27, P28; IB3, IB6, IB7, IB8, B11, B12, B16, B17, B20 through B29, B31, B32, B33, B36, B37, B38, BX1, BX2, BX3, BX6, BX7, BX8 some Z13	I-551 stamp in foreign passport with one of the preceding codes; or IMPORTANT: Applicant has filed an I-130 or I-360 petition as a battered alien. INS Form - 797 is documentation of approval of an I-130 application.

Immigration Status	CARES Code	I-94 Codes	I-551 Codes	Other
Cuban/Haitian Entrant	11	212(d)(5) or paroled or C/H Entrant and from Cuba or Haiti or I-551 stamp and CU6 or CH6	CU6 or CU7, CH6	Unexpired and expired 1-551 stamp in foreign passport
Deportation Withheld	15	106 or 243(h) or 241(b)(3)	NA	INS Form I-688B annotated 274a.12(a)(10); INS Form I-766, annotated A10; order from an immigration judge showing deportation withheld under 243(h) or removal withheld under 241(b)(3)
Battered Alien	16	AR1, AR6, C20 through C29, CF1, CF2, CR1, CR6, CR7, CX1, CX2, CX3, CX6, CX7, CX8, F20 through F29, FX1, FX2, FX3, FX6, FX7, FX8, IF1, IF2, IR1, IR2, IR3, IR4, IR6, IR7, IR8, IR9, IW1, IW2, IW6, IW7, MR6, MR7, P21, P22, P23, P26, P27, P28; IB3, IB6, IB7, IB8, B11, B12, B16, B17, B20 through B29, B31, B32, B33, B36, B37, B37, B38, BX1, BX2, BX3, BX6, BX7, BX8 some Z13	AR1, AR6, C20 through C29, CF1, CF2, CR1, CR6, CR7, CX1, CX2, CX3, CX6, CX7, CX8, F20 through F29, FX1, FX2, FX3, FX6, FX7, FX8, IF1, IF2, IR1, IR2, IR3, IR4, IR6, IR7, IR8, IR9, IW1, IW2, IW6, IW7, MR6, MR7, P21, P22, P23, P26, P27, P28; IB3, IB6, IB7, IB8, B11, B12, B16, B17, B20 through B29, B31, B32, B33, B36, B37, B38, BX1, BX2, BX3, BX6, BX7, BX8 some Z13	I-551 stamp in foreign passport with one of the preceding codes; or IMPORTANT: Applicant has filed an I-130 or I-360 petition as a battered alien. INS Form - 797 is documentation of approval of an I-130 application.
Amerasian	17	AM1, AM2, or AM3	AM 6, AM7, or AM8	I-551 stamp in foreign passport with one of the preceding codes
Foreign born Native American	18	S13	S13	I-551 stamp in foreign passport with S13 tribal membership card from federally recognized tribe.
Trafficking Victim	19	T-2, T-3, T-4 and T-5 known as "Derivative T" visas are not currently available in the SAVE system.   Call the toll-free trafficking verification line at 1-866-401-5510 to notify ORR of the benefits for which the individual has applied.		Health and Human Service Office of Refugee Resettlement Certification Letter

Hanover Law specializes in immigration defense -- specifically in court for removal, deportation, and asylum claims. We would be glad to take a look at your situation and help you get the best possible outcome. Call us at 703-402-2723 to discuss your case and begin the process getting you both legal, and working, in the US.

S

Sean R. Hanover, Esq
HanoverLawPC.com
Contact Us
703-402-2723

I-94 and -Humanitarian- Notation in Immigration Law

I was recently answering questions on AVVO, an attorney inquriy board that, in part, specializes in immigration questions. An interesting question about I-94 forms and humaitarian/refugee parole was asked.

First, you need to understand the purpose of an I-94. The I-94 is often (but not always) given when an immigrant enters the country through a boarder crossing or inspection point. The actual name of the form is "arrival/departure record". It should be noted that many immigrants do NOT get this, and its absence does not per se cause a denial of any benefit (although it does shift the burden of proving legal entry onto the immigrant). Most commonly, folks come to the United States under a B2 visa. This visa, known as a visitor visa, entitles the bearer to remain up to 6 months in the country. The actual amount of time the visa holder may stay is -- you got it! - marked on the I-94. There are also certain codes entered on the I-94 that tell CBP (custom and board patrol officers) the nature of your entry, whether you are being watched or tracked, if you are permitted multiple entry/re-entry on the same I-94, etc.). In the instant case, the question is: what does the indication "indefinite" mean on the I-94? It means that instead of a 6-mos or other time window for this arriving alien, CBP granted "parole" to remain in the country without ever having to depart. This is in effect a pseudo-deferral, allowing the immigrant to remain in the country, but providing no benefits (work permit, for example). It is an excellent defense to a removal charge (assuming no criminal charges), but does little to provide a future for the immigrant.

In this instance, the proper next step would be application for asylum. Asylum is, defacto, a request for humanitarian/refugee relief. It means that you have a credible, meaningful fear of returning from where-ever you came from. More importantly, because CBP already paroled you in under humanitarian grounds, the credible fear determination is all but automatic. I don't know the specifics of your case, but one can imagine it must be compelling, as CBP paroles are not that common.

Once you apply for asylum, and you have established your credible fear during that process, you are eligible for EAD (employment authorization documents). This in turn allows you to work legally in the US.

The trick here is to ensure your asylum application process is done properly and timely, so you do not lose out on the potential benefit of a CBP humanitarian parole.

Hanover Law specializes in immigration defense -- specifically in court for removal, deportation, and asylum claims. We would be glad to take a look at your situation and help you get the best possible outcome. Call us at 703-402-2723 to discuss your case and begin the process getting you both legal, and working, in the US.

S

Sean R. Hanover, Esq
HanoverLawPC.com
Contact Us
703-402-2723